[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot 117 - EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections
Eddy Nigg
eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Fri Apr 4 20:03:59 UTC 2014
On 04/03/2014 12:08 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> We think it is certainly
> questionable as to whether this standard has achieved enough industry
> interest on either side of the fence to continue being a work product of
> the CAB Forum.
True, but there are probably reasons for it - as an example we have
issues with at least two items before we can support the EV guidelines
for code signing certificates. I believe it's upon the CAs like
ourselves to introduce possible changes to the guidelines in order to
get higher adoption.
In any case I prefer guidelines that were developed by the forum
transparently than behind closed doors between one vendor and two CAs.
Therefor the working group and general effort is certainly beneficial.
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140404/127262fb/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6156 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140404/127262fb/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the Public
mailing list