[cabfpub] [cabfquest] Ballot 111 - Accelerate Max Certificate Lifetime Reduction Timetable

Rick Andrews Rick_Andrews at symantec.com
Thu Nov 28 00:44:47 UTC 2013

I was on the last call and participated in the discussion. However, when I went back to our product teams to discuss it, we collectively came to the opinion that Dean expressed.


On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:56 PM, "Dean Coclin" <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com<mailto:Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>> wrote:

I wasn’t on that call and since we are in the “review” period, it’s an appropriate time to comment.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 5:18 PM
To: CABFPub (public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>)
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [cabfquest] Ballot 111 - Accelerate Max Certificate Lifetime Reduction Timetable

On 11/27/2013 11:53 PM, From Dean Coclin:
But given that this date appears to be arbitrarily chosen without regard to CA business practices, we urge the proponents to reconsider and discuss an appropriate date on the next call.

Isn't this exactly what we did at the last call? Also the arguments were made in favor and against during the discussion which resulted in the 1st April date.



Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO

StartCom Ltd.<http://www.startcom.org>


startcom at startcom.org<xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>


Join the Revolution!<http://blog.startcom.org>


Follow Me<http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org<mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20131127/4e95d9fa/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list