[cabfpub] Ballot 100: Extend Deadline - OCSP Good Response

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Tue May 28 13:17:20 UTC 2013

On 24/05/13 15:59, Joseph.R.Kaluzny at wellsfargo.com wrote:
> To add a little history for this particular topic.. we approached
> Microsoft with this concern about a year ago and after learning
> support was not planned, did approach the CAB and raised this as an
> issue for compliance. Response a year ago from CAB was that it would
> be re-evaluated this year again to see where the industry is at since
> it was well known that some vendors were out of compliance when this
> was put into the BR. Since we were told it would be re-evaluated our
> expectations were that the BR would be adjusted based on current
> conditions. Vendors have not all come up to compliance as  hoped for
> so the BR should really be adjusted to allow those remaining products
> to be updated or for customers to move off those platforms.

What, if anything, do you suggest we do differently this time round to
make sure the same thing doesn't happen in a year's time?


More information about the Public mailing list