[cabfpub] Ballot 100: Extend Deadline - OCSP Good Response

Brian Trzupek BTrzupek at trustwave.com
Fri May 24 14:06:31 UTC 2013


Our OCSP server was developed in house, is compliant, and open sourced here:


From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [public-bounces at cabforum.org] on behalf of Gervase Markham [gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:24 AM
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 100:  Extend Deadline - OCSP Good Response

On 23/05/13 21:19, Ben Wilson wrote:
> EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, in order to allow third party vendors of OCSP
> responders to enable their software to support the requirement, we

Before voting on this, can each CA tell us which OCSP server vendor they
use (or if they have written it in house) and what info they have from
that vendor about their timeframe for supporting this requirement?

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org


This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.

More information about the Public mailing list