[cabfpub] Proposed modification to domain verification
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Thu May 16 20:56:41 UTC 2013
On 05/15/2013 10:44 PM, From Jeremy Rowley:
>
> In preparation of tomorrow’s call, here’s our proposal on how the
> domain validation section should change. At the very least, this
> should get everyone on the same discussion and help clearly identity
> where there are open issues.
>
In continuation of our call today and the domain control validation
proposal for EV certificates I would like to highlight the following
items from the BR:
Under section 11.1.1 Authorization by Domain Name Registrant:
For each Fully-Qualified Domain Name listed in a Certificate, the CA
SHALL confirm that, as of the date the Certificate was issued, the
Applicant either is the Domain Name Registrant or has control over
the FQDN by:
.......
3. Communicating directly with the Domain Name Registrant using the
contact information listed in the WHOIS record’s “registrant”,
“technical”, or “administrative” field;
4. Communicating with the Domain’s administrator using an email
address created by pre-pending ‘admin’, ‘administrator’,
‘webmaster’, ‘hostmaster’, or ‘postmaster’ in the local part,
followed by the at-sign (“@”), followed by the Domain Name, which
may be formed by pruning zero or more components from the requested
FQDN;
....
Note: For purposes of determining the appropriate domain name level
or Domain Namespace, the registerable Domain Name is the
second-level domain for generic top-level domains (gTLD) such as
.com, .net, or .org, or, if the Fully Qualified Domain Name contains
a 2 letter Country Code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD), then the domain
level is whatever is allowed for registration according to the rules
of that ccTLD.
This means that the domain name as indicated above must be validated,
e.g. if a subscriber requests sub.domain.co.uk the CA must use
webmaster at domain.co.uk or one of the other administrative addresses. The
"pruning zero or more components" is a means to get to the registered
domain name, but maybe the "may" preceding is misunderstood either by me
or some others and it would warrant some clarifications (which reminds
me that Tim made some attempt but then left the forum).
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130516/ed0e42c9/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4540 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130516/ed0e42c9/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the Public
mailing list