[cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

[Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)]

On 05/08/2013 07:00 PM, From Rich Smith:
> My core argument is simply that, with the exception of #7 which, as 
> Jeremy has pointed out, is probably too vague to allow for EV, the 
> other acceptable methods described in the BR are AT LEAST as reliable 
> as looking at WHOIS info (I consider most of them superior) so they 
> should be allowed for EV.

Before we continue to argue between ourselves I'm very much interested 
to hear the opinions of the browsers vendors first. Tom, Gerv and of 
course any others...what do you think?


Regards
Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130508/16b5d898/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4540 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130508/16b5d898/attachment-0001.p7s>