[cabfpub] EV code signing SAN

[Ben Wilson]

Iñigo,

>From what I can tell, section 9.2.2 is incorrect and an errata is needed to
fix it.  It should say “As specified in Section 9.7(B).”

 

From: management-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:management-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of i-barreira at izenpe.net
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:58 AM
To: management at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfman] EV code signing SAN

 

Good morning,

 

Reviewing the EV code signing certs in version 1.1 I´ve found something that
I don´t understand clearly so need your help. 

 

In section 9.2.2 it says that this field SHOULD NOT be included in the EV
code signing objects and in 9.7 (B) it says that the certificate MUST
include a SubjectAltName:permanentIdentifier which must contain 
.

 

Is this a contradiction? How should I interpretate it?

 

TIA

 

 

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net

945067705

 



ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea.
Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki
idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna.
KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la
que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por
error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se
pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130514/1f876c48/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130514/1f876c48/attachment-0002.png>