[cabfpub] Revised EV Domain Motion

Jeremy Rowley jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
Mon Jun 10 12:16:33 UTC 2013

We plan on discussing it tomorrow, but I will happily remove it in the next
version if we can get consent on how to move forward.


From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Mads Egil Henriksveen
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:51 AM
To: richard.smith at comodo.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Revised EV Domain Motion


I think this is a good proposal, it simplifies and clarifies some
requirements that we have had some difficulties understanding. 


However, I notice that the phrase "exclusive right" is back. If this is by
intention, please explain why. If not, remove it and I am willing to endorse
this motion.




From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Rich Smith
Sent: 7. juni 2013 15:42
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfpub] Revised EV Domain Motion


Jeremy and I have been working together to try to address the concerns
voiced regarding my previous suggestion to modify the EV domain verification
requirements.  We believe that the attached version addresses the concerns
that came up in previous discussions.  Please review the attached draft and
let us know if you have concerns with the draft and/or are willing to




Rich Smith

Validation Manager


http://www.comodo.com <http://www.comodo.com/> 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130610/8c62a9d9/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list