[cabfpub] Ballot 106 - Extended deadline to prohibit OCSP good response for non-issued certificates

[Steve Roylance]

Hi Eddy. 
Ryan is correct as the ballot carves out Name Constrained CAs and is under vote already.   The 106 ballot allows grace to the non name constrained entities.

Sent from my iPhone

On 23 Jul 2013, at 19:05, Ryan Hurst <ryan.hurst at globalsign.com> wrote:

> I don't think so.
> 
> Ryan Hurst
> Chief Technology Officer
> GMO Globalsign
> 
> twitter: @rmhrisk
> email: ryan.hurst at globalsign.com
> phone: 206-650-7926
> 
> Sent from my phone, please forgive the brevity.
> 
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 8:47 PM, "Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)" <eddy_nigg at startcom.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 07/23/2013 07:43 PM, From Ben Wilson:
>>> 
>>> Ballot 106 – Extended Deadline to Prohibit OCSP “Good” Response for  Non-Issued Certificates
>> 
>> Just one question - in light of this ballot, would part of the 105 ballot that deals with OCSP become redundant? 
>> 
>> Regards 
>>  
>> Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
>>  	StartCom Ltd.
>> XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org
>> Blog: 	Join the Revolution!
>> Twitter: 	Follow Me
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Public mailing list
>> Public at cabforum.org
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130723/105a2125/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130723/105a2125/attachment-0001.p7s>