[cabfpub] Ballot 108: Clarifying the scope of the baseline requirements

[Jeremy Rowley]

I'm using Ryan's language, without the original first sentence.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Robin Alden
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:22 AM
To: 'Gervase Markham'; jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
Cc: 'CABFPub'
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 108: Clarifying the scope of the baseline
requirements

I agree.

Ambiguity arises in the original first sentence because Client certificates
can also be part of TLS/SSL handshakes.

Robin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public- 
> bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
> Sent: 29 July 2013 09:37
> To: jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
> Cc: 'CABFPub'
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 108: Clarifying the scope of the
baseline
> requirements
> 
> On 26/07/13 21:05, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> > Sounds good.  I'll circulate a formal ballot with Ryan's
modifications.
> 
> Ryan's version didn't include the first sentence from your version;
was
> that intentional? I hope so, because that also seemed ambiguous to me, 
> and Ryan's version seems to cover everything. So let's continue to
omit
> that sentence.
> 
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public