[cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

Fri Feb 1 21:35:48 UTC 2013

I really don’t think any ballot is needed to post something on our website that has been reviewed and discussed at multiple face to face meetings and calls. Brad did a great job writing it and offered it to the CABF members without restriction. If someone has a problem with the document, please speak now. Otherwise, let’s put it up Monday.

Dean

From: Ben Wilson [mailto:ben at digicert.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 2:55 PM
To: kirk_hall at trendmicro.com; Dean Coclin; public at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

I’m not sure, and I don’t want to step on anyone’s toes.  It was discussed a year ago.  If we can do an abbreviated (one business day), unanimous consent ballot (any veto throws it into a two-week cycle), then the ballot might read:

Dean Coclin made the following motion, which was endorsed by Kirk Hall and Chris Palmer:

Motion Begins

Effective immediately, the CA/Browser Forum reaffirms "Internal Server Names and IP Address Requirements for SSL:  Guidance on the Deprecation of Internal Server Names and Reserved IP Addresses, June 2012, Version 1.0" as its public guidance on this issue and approves its posting on the CAB Forum web site.

Motion Ends

This ballot is by one-business-day unanimous consent.  Any opposition received within such period will trigger a 7-day review-and-comment  period followed by a 7-day voting period to be held in accordance with the CAB Forum ByLaws.  Notice of any national holidays within the next full business day of any member must be raised in response to this ballot or else such objection is deemed waived.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of kirk_hall at trendmicro.com
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:31 PM
To: ben at digicert.com; 'Dean Coclin'; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

I meant to be the second endorser – but I don’t think we really need a formal Ballot on this, do we?

Assuming we have Brad’s permission, does anyone object to posting it on the CABF website cabforum.org?

From: Ben Wilson [mailto:ben at digicert.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:59 AM
To: Kirk Hall (RD-US); 'Dean Coclin'; public at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

A second endorser is needed.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of kirk_hall at trendmicro.com
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:29 AM
To: Dean Coclin; ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

I agree – seconded.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dean Coclin
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:27 AM
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

Given the number of inquiries we have received on this topic, I move that we post this to the website as soon as possible under Documents with an announcement on the main page.

Dean

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:43 AM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfpub] CAB Forum Guidance on Deprecation of Internal Server Names

As discussed during a previous teleconference, here is Brad’s white paper on the deprecation of internal server names.  Assuming it is acceptable, we should post it on our web site.  I’ll put the PDF and DOC on the wiki.

TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130201/3ef75aeb/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6083 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130201/3ef75aeb/attachment-0001.p7s>