[cabfpub] Proposal for change of definition of Internal Server Name in the BRs

[Gervase Markham]

On 17/12/13 02:02, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Within Chromium's implementation, we've long interpreted Internal Server
> Name exactly as you describe, and that has been our primary concern with
> the deprecation of such names.
> 
> The one caveat I would propose that, as we seek to improve wording, we
> also ensure that the name that has been registered with a Domain Name
> Registar authorized by the ICANN-assigned Registry for that domain name
> space.

This sounds good to me, with Ryan's caveat taken note of. The alternate
domain names space has multiple competing instances of the same TLD, and
they will no doubt clash with the new ICANN ones. I think we have to be
ICANN-only.

Gerv