[cabfpub] Ballot 108: Clarifying the scope of the baseline requirements

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Thu Aug 8 15:19:32 UTC 2013

On 02/08/13 12:19, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> There is a potential conflict that I think needs more data and discussion:

We agree; hence Mozilla votes NO on the ballot in its current form.

We would like to see it withdrawn until further information can be
gathered. We very much support the goal of this ballot; we want the BRs
to cover all certs capable of being used by SSL servers. But we need to
figure out whether this requires a change in the definition of what the
BRs cover, or a change (e.g. on clients) in the definition of "capable
of being used by SSL servers". Or something else.


More information about the Public mailing list