[cabfpub] Ballot 108: Clarifying the scope of the baseline requirements

Geoff Keating geoffk at apple.com
Thu Aug 1 19:43:38 UTC 2013

On 01/08/2013, at 10:48 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:

> For what it's worth, the goal here would be to ensure that
> certificates that are *technically capable* of being used for server
> certificates are seen as in-scope, regardless of whether or not they
> are *intended* to be used as such.

It should be understood that what Ryan refers to is not just a theoretical situation; the DigiNotar certificates were issued with a configuration intended to be used for S/MIME.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130801/e5bd5c74/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list