[cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

Sissel Hoel Sissel.Hoel at buypass.no
Fri Aug 9 01:07:47 MST 2013


Hi Ben.

Please withdraw the ballot for now. 
Mads is on vacation and will be back on next Monday, I am sure you will hear from him after that.

Regards, Sissel

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: 8. august 2013 20:41
To: 'Gervase Markham'; kirk_hall at trendmicro.com; Mads Egil Henriksveen; i-barreira at izenpe.net
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

Without Kirk's endorsement and the other votes of concern let's consider the ballot withdrawn for further editing.  

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:16 AM
To: ben at digicert.com
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

On 30/07/13 16:59, Ben Wilson wrote:
> We could, but we might want to rewrite the paragraph and explain it more.

Mozilla votes NO - see below for why.

Looking at the discussion history for ballot 107, it was proposed, and then various people provided comments, but it has not been withdrawn or resubmitted, and voting ends tomorrow. (With one early vote from Trend Micro and one from GlobalSign being the only current outstanding votes).

I think consideration needs to be given to the feedback provided and so, to prevent it 'accidentally' passing when most people seem not to have voted, Mozilla votes NO. We are not against in principle, but we wish to see either a good explanation of why the proposed changes are not necessary, or the ballot being withdrawn and updated. If the former is provided before the deadline, we would certainly consider changing our vote.

Unfortunately, I am not able to be on the call today.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


More information about the Public mailing list