[cabfpub] Must Staple OID

[Ryan Hurst]

Makes sense to me.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews at symantec.com> wrote:

> Sounds good to me. 
> 
> -Rick
> 
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 12:12 AM, "Jeremy Rowley" <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi everyone,
>>  
>> One of the items discussed during today’s revocation meeting was the use of a “must staple” OID.  Does anyone object to using 2.23.140.16.1?  2.23.140 is the ca-browser-forum, 16 is ocsp, and 1 will become “must-staple”.
>>  
>> Jeremy Rowley
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Public mailing list
>> Public at cabforum.org
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120928/75cab157/attachment-0004.html>