[cabfpub] Ballot [87] - Instant Runoff Ballot on Governance - Results

[i-barreira at izenpe.net]

Ok.
Would it be possible to have a recap or kind of a comparision table with both proposals about the terms they´re proposing?

Regards


Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net
945067705


ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Chris Palmer [mailto:palmer at google.com] 
Enviado el: jueves, 06 de septiembre de 2012 0:54
Para: ben at digicert.com
CC: Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo; public at cabforum.org
Asunto: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot [87] - Instant Runoff Ballot on Governance - Results

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Ben Wilson <ben at digicert.com> wrote:

> If a modification is for the betterment of the proposal and keeps with 
> the spirit of it by not dramatically changing the direction or overall 
> structure of the proposal, then I think we all benefit.  I’m not 
> saying that either proposal will or should be “modified.”  But 
> Digicert’s proposal was 5 pages and could be simplified and explained 
> more. TrendMicro’s was a 1 ½ framework that proposed little change 
> except that “specific details, bylaws, rules, and intra-member 
> agreements would be drafted and approved by the Forum.”  I think that having more information is better when making a decision than
> having less information.   Finally, I think we should leave open the option
> for a “compromise” position between the two proposals, which might be 
> better than one proposal or the other alone.

That's right. Clarifying modifications in the spirit of the original were always part of the plan for this vote.