[cabfpub] Ballot [87] - Instant Runoff Ballot on Governance - Results

Ben Wilson ben at digicert.com
Wed Sep 5 15:29:32 UTC 2012

If a modification is for the betterment of the proposal and keeps with the
spirit of it by not dramatically changing the direction or overall structure
of the proposal, then I think we all benefit.  I’m not saying that either
proposal will or should be “modified.”  But Digicert’s proposal was 5 pages
and could be simplified and explained more. TrendMicro’s was a 1 ½ framework
that proposed little change except that “specific details, bylaws, rules,
and intra-member agreements would be drafted and approved by the Forum.”  I
think that having more information is better when making a decision than
having less information.   Finally, I think we should leave open the option
for a “compromise” position between the two proposals, which might be better
than one proposal or the other alone.


From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of i-barreira at izenpe.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:01 AM
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot [87] - Instant Runoff Ballot on Governance -


The proposals can be modified? I think it´s not fair



Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net



ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea.
Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki
idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna.
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la
que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por
error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se
pusiese en contacto con el remitente.


De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En
nombre de Ben Wilson
Enviado el: viernes, 31 de agosto de 2012 23:58
Para: public at cabforum.org
Asunto: [cabfpub] Ballot [87] - Instant Runoff Ballot on Governance -


Voting closed on Ballot 87 with the following results:


Round 1 - Trend Micro 7, DigiCert 5, PayPal 4, Microsoft 1, No Change 0

Round 2 - Trend Micro 7, DigiCert 5, PayPal 4, Microsoft 1

Round 3 - Trend Micro 7, DigiCert 6, PayPal 4

Round 3 - Trend Micro 7, DigiCert 10


Result: Proposals of Trend Micro and DigiCert will proceed to further vote.

A two-week period (Sept. 1-14) begins during which the authors of the two
remaining proposals on the final ballot may modify their proposals while
keeping to the spirit of the proposal posted to http://www.cabforum.org.

At the end of this two-week period (Sept. 14), the two remaining proposals
will be published for a seven-day review period (Sept. 14-21), followed by a
seven-day voting period (Sept. 21-28) closing on September 28 at 2100 UTC. 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120905/44a28439/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120905/44a28439/attachment-0004.png>

More information about the Public mailing list