[cabfpub] Revised document for Ballot 89 - Adopt Requirements for the Processing of EV SSL Certificates v.2

[Jeremy Rowley]

I imagine all CAs have a similar policy, which is why I found Gerv’s question on the subject rather surprising.

 

Jeremy

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:25 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Revised document for Ballot 89 - Adopt Requirements for the Processing of EV SSL Certificates v.2

 


On 10/17/2012 12:06 AM, From Jeremy Rowley: 

For the record, DigiCert has similar policies in place.  Our policy against
certificates being used on sites engaged in illegal conduct is documented in
both our customer agreements and CPS.


I believe most CAs have that, no? Differences might be in interpretation of the circumstances, required evidences (if any), time of revocation etc.




Regards 


 


Signer: 

Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO


 

StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> 


XMPP: 

startcom at startcom.org


Blog: 

Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> 


Twitter: 

Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg> 


 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121016/1f1f2934/attachment-0004.html>