[cabfpub] Fwd: [pkix] Straw-poll on OCSP responses for non-revoked certificates.
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Wed Oct 31 11:57:38 MST 2012
On 10/31/2012 08:28 PM, From Ben Wilson:
> I don’t think clients should cache an OCSP response forever. If the
> client thinks that the OCSP response of revoked was incorrect, it
> should query again and if the OCSP response says “good” then this is
> not an issue.
Ohommm...does your policy allow to do that? I mean, can you change a
revoked to valid?
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121031/2428f5ce/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4540 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121031/2428f5ce/attachment.bin
More information about the Public
mailing list