[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names

[kirk_hall at trendmicro.com]

The only way a CA could comply with your rules would be to do an OV authentication for every customer before deciding whether or not to issue a DV SANs cert.  That's pretty much the same as outlawing DV SANs certs

From: Steve Roylance [mailto:steve.roylance at globalsign.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:33 AM
To: Kirk Hall (RD-US)
Cc: 'CABForum Management'; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfman] [cabfpub] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names

Kirk,

It is NOT meant to prohibit  all types of DV SANs

It is meant to prohibit DV SANs under certain conditions i.e. where non unique information is contained, or Public IPs are used, or there is a mixture of owners as detailed by the domain registration.

If you own kirk.com and finewineexpert.com then you can have both inside if they are registered to you.

Please read the text again carefully and highlight which situation you specifically don't agree with and why you feel it's acceptable to continue.

Steve

From: "kirk_hall at trendmicro.com<mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>" <kirk_hall at trendmicro.com<mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>>
Date: Friday, 16 November 2012 17:24
To: CABForum Management <management at cabforum.org<mailto:management at cabforum.org>>, "public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>" <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [cabfman] [cabfpub] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names


To help members evaluate Ballot 92 we are attaching a side-by-side comparison of current Baseline Requirements language with the proposed new language.  As before, the intent of this ballot is to prohibit DV SANs certificates, which we will oppose.



Trend Micro does not issue DV certificates, but we think they serve a valuable security function in increasing the use of SSL.  Forcing customers to buy OV certs instead is anti-competitive and will likely lead to less use of SSL to secure sites.

TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE

The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidentialand may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or

disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or

telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.


_______________________________________________ Management mailing list Management at cabforum.org<mailto:Management at cabforum.org> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management

<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
</pre></td></tr></table>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121116/d53402e2/attachment-0004.html>