[cabfpub] Tally of Results of Straw Poll on IPR Policy Scope (Membership vs. Participation)

[Ben Wilson]

Here are both redlined versions.  I also received a vote from Apple.  Here
is a revised tally.

 


 

 

A

B

C

D

E

H

I


1

Apple

2

1

 

 

 

3

 


2

BuyPass

3

 

1

 

2

 

 


3

Comodo

 

 

1

 

 

 

2


4

DigiCert

 

3

2

5

4

 

1


5

Entrust

 

 

2

1

 

 

 


6

Globalsign

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


7

Identrust

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


8

Izenpe

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


9

Logius

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


10

Microsoft

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


11

Mozilla

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


12

Opera

 

 

1

 

2

 

 


13

Quovadis

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


14

RSA

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


15

SSC

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


16

StarCom

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


17

Symantec

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


18

Trend Micro

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


19

Trustis

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


20

Trustwave

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


21

T-Systems

1

 

3

2

 

 

 


21

Initial Round

1

1

9

1

0

8

1


21

Final Round

0

0

12

0

0

9

0

 

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:32 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Tally of Results of Straw Poll on IPR Policy Scope
(Membership vs. Participation)

 

I think that previously attached redlined version I just sent was somehow a
comparison against the wrong version.  I'll try to figure out how that
happened and resend the right one, along with one that compares the 1.04
with the original 1.0.

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:22 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfpub] Tally of Results of Straw Poll on IPR Policy Scope
(Membership vs. Participation)

 

Here is what I think we have as results for our straw poll:


 

 

A

B

C

D

E

H

I


1

BuyPass

3

 

1

 

2

 

 


2

Comodo

 

 

1

 

 

 

2


3

DigiCert

 

3

2

5

4

 

1


4

Entrust

 

 

2

1

 

 

 


5

Globalsign

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


6

Identrust

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


7

Izenpe

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


8

Logius

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


9

Microsoft

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


10

Mozilla

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


11

Opera

 

 

1

 

2

 

 


12

Quovadis

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


13

RSA

 

 

1

 

 

 

 


14

SSC

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


15

StarCom

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


16

Symantec

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


17

Trend Micro

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


18

Trustis

 

 

1

 

 

2

 


19

Trustwave

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


20

T-Systems

1

 

3

2

 

 

 


20

Initial Round

1

0

9

1

0

8

1


20

Final Round

0

0

12

0

0

8

0

 

So I think the appropriate course of action is to review the attached
revised IPR Policy (which I have numbed v.1.04 to distinguish it from
v.1.03) and to decide whether to refer this issue back to the IPR Committee
for further discussion or to continue the discussion on the list.  (Please
note that to keep the recent changes more clear, the attached is a redline
of version 1.03 distributed by Marc Braner to the IPR Committee on Friday,
Oct. 19th, and not a redline of v.1.0.)  I will create a redline of the
delta between v.1.0 and the attached 1.04 and upload it to the wiki for
later distribution to anyone wanting a full comparison of the two.

Yours truly,

Ben

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121115/294cbf99/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CABForumIPR_11-15-2012.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 92160 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121115/294cbf99/attachment-0008.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CABForumIPRv1.04-Delta from v.1.0.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 103424 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121115/294cbf99/attachment-0009.doc>