[cabfpub] Ballot 75 and Emergency Ballot 77

Ben Wilson ben at digicert.com
Sat Jun 9 00:01:04 UTC 2012

Thanks.  Correction made.  My bad - it was tagged as spam and I didn't catch it when sorting my subject lines alphabetically.  I'll get that fixed.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Chris Palmer
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 5:34 PM
To: ben at digicert.com
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 75 and Emergency Ballot 77

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Ben Wilson <ben at digicert.com> wrote:

> On Ballot 75 (allows Non-critical Name Constraints as an exception to RFC 5280 until the Name Constraints extension is supported by Application Software Suppliers whose software is used by a substantial portion of Relying Parties worldwide), the quorum requirement was 8, and we received “Yes” votes from Buypass, SSC, Microsoft, Opera, Symantec, IdenTrust, KEYNECTIS, Entrust, Izenpe, Comodo, Apple, T-Systems, QuoVadis, StartCom, Mozilla, and GlobalSign.  We received a “No” vote from Chunghwa Telecom, and no abstentions.  Therefore, the motion passes.  It can be reviewed here:
> https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/75%20-%20NameConstraints%20criticality%2
> 0flag

For the record, Google also voted Yes on 25 May, in a message from agl at google.com.

Maybe we still have a spam false positive problem. :) _______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org

More information about the Public mailing list