[cabfpub] ISO 3166-1 country codes

[Erwann Abalea]

On the same subject, same location, other certificates.

Last year Kosovo deployed biometric passports (ICAO MRTD and EAC) 
obviously for internal use only, and they choosed "KS" as the alpha-2 
country code.
This country code is present in CSCA root certificate and in DS 
certificates.

"KS" is declared as free for assignment by ISO 3166/MA only.
While they're practically free to use anything they want in their 
private certificates, I don't recommend using "KS" for public facing 
certificates.
And I'm not in favor of allowing "XK" for EV certificates.

-- 
Erwann ABALEA

Le 31/07/2012 12:17, William Madell a écrit :
>
> Agreed -- the CABF can decide to use 'XK' as its user-assigned country 
> code for Kosovo within the context of the BRs (perhaps, also in the 
> context of EV?).
>
> As Erwann recommends, the CABF should publicly document that decision 
> -- I suggest as either an erratum or appendix to the BRs.
>
> Bill
>
> *From:*public-bounces at cabforum.org 
> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Erwann Abalea
> *Sent:* 31 July 2012 10:46
> *To:* public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] ISO 3166-1 country codes
>
> Nice question.
>
> XK being one of the "user-assigned code elements", it can therefore be 
> freely used wherever you want, and it won't be used in any update of 
> the standard.
> http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes/special-code-elements-iso-3166.htm#Reserved-code-elements 
> is pretty clear on the purpose and limits of the user-assigned codes.
> Faced with such a request, I'd also tend to approve it, publicly 
> document the use of "XK" code to designate "Kosovo", and notify the 
> ISO-3166/MA of the use of this code.
>
> EU hasn't recognized Kosovo as an independant nation, it's strange 
> that XK is used by the EC.
>
>
> -- 
> Erwann ABALEA
>   
>
> Le 30/07/2012 22:39, Rich Smith a écrit :
>
>     I've come across an edge case that I'd like to get some discussion on.
>
>     We have received a request for a customer in Kosovo, which the two
>     jurisdictions to which we are subject (US and UK) recognize as a
>     sovereign country. However because there is still some wrangling
>     going on in the UN, Kosovo does not at this time have an official
>     ISO 3166 country code.
>
>     I came across some information that the European Commission,
>     Switzerland, and the Deutsche Bundesbank among others are
>     temporarily using XK as a designator for Kosovo.  Any thought as
>     to whether or not doing the same in a certificate would be in
>     compliance with Section 9.2.5 of the BRs?
>
>     9.2.5      Subject Country Name Field
>
>     Certificate Field:  subject:countryName (OID: 2.5.4.6)
>
>     Required/Optional:  Optional
>
>     Contents:  If the subject:countryName field is present, then the
>     CA SHALL verify the country associated with the Subject in
>     accordance with Section 11.2.5 and use its two-letter ISO 3166-1
>     country code.
>
>     Since XK is set aside by the ISO as user assigned, I tend to lean
>     toward allowing it, but I also think that we should probably
>     decide as a group so that we all (at least all in jurisdictions
>     which recognize Kosovo) treat Kosovo in a uniform fashion.  Thoughts?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120731/472fbcca/attachment-0004.html>