[cabfpub] Ballot[80 - revised] - BR Response for non-issued certificates

Carsten.Dahlenkamp at t-systems.com Carsten.Dahlenkamp at t-systems.com
Fri Jul 27 04:55:47 MST 2012


Tim,

Sorry for being late :-S

I endorse the amended ballot, too

Best regards
   Carsten

Carsten Dahlenkamp
T-Systems International GmbH
Trust Center Applications
Untere Industriestraße 20, 57250 Netphen, Germany
+49 271 708-1643 (Tel.)
E-Mail: carsten.dahlenkamp at t-systems.com
http://www.t-systems.com, http://www.telesec.de

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:35 PM
To: 'Tim Moses'; 'CABFPub'
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot[80 - revised] - BR Response for non-issued certificates

I re-endorse.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Moses
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 2:29 PM
To: CABFPub
Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot[80 - revised] - BR Response for non-issued certificates


Yngve Pettersen has accepted a "friendly amendment".  Ben Wilson and Carsten Dahlenkamp are requested to confirm their continued endorsement.  The motion now reads as follows:

... Motion begins....

Effective 1 Feb 2013

... Erratum begins ...

Insert a new section at the end of section 13.2 of the Baseline Requirements with the following heading and text:

"13.2.6 Response for non-issued certificates

If the OCSP responder receives a request for status of a certificate that has not been issued, then the responder SHOULD NOT respond with a "good" status. The CA SHOULD monitor the responder for such requests as part of its security response procedures.

Effective 1 August 2013, OCSP responders MUST NOT respond with a "good" status for such certificates."

... Erratum ends ...

The ballot review period comes into effect at 21:00 UTC on 19 July 2012 and will close at 21:00 UTC on 26 July 2012. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 21:00 UTC on 2 August 2012. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.

... Motions ends ...

A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response.

A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.

Voting members are listed here:

http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html

with the addition of TrendMicro<https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/TrendMicro>.

In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and one half or more of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favour. Also, at least seven members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favour, voting against or abstaining


T: +1 613 270 3183

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120727/08d34436/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Public mailing list