[cabfpub] Revised ISO 3166-1 Motion

[Rich Smith]

Excellent.  :-)

I have a final version of this motion ready to go with 2 endorsers, however as 
we are at the moment officially w/out a Forum chair, should I just add all the 
official wording and ballot number to it myself and post?  I believe this 
would be Ballot 84.

-Rich





From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On 
Behalf Of Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:05 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Revised ISO 3166-1 Motion




On 08/02/2012 07:32 PM, From Rich Smith:


I think this contains all of the important content from the previous motion, 
addressing the concerns voiced by Bill, Jeremy and Gerv, but makes it clear 
that the CA/B Forums role is this type of situation is purely advisory and as 
that of a repository of usage information, which I hope addresses Eddy's 
concerns about having the Forum get embroiled in the politics of the subject 
matter.


This looks much better I think.


Regards





Signer:

Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO




StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>


XMPP:

startcom at startcom.org


Blog:

Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>


Twitter:

Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120802/3f96e92d/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6391 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120802/3f96e92d/attachment-0004.bin>