[cabfpub] Auditors and the IPR Agreement

[tScheme Technical Manager]

The questions would be: would they be bound by the WebTrust IPR ? I think not.

 

If KPMG made a statement about how they carry out tScheme audits (they are a tScheme-recognised assessor) – would that be covered under the tScheme IPR agreement ? What about if they said something about an ETSI audit – whose IPR agreement would that be under? NO – unworkable. They need to participate as themselves and, hence, follow the same process as other Members/Observers whichever they choose to become.

 

Regards

Richard

------------------------------------
Richard Trevorah
Technical Manager
tScheme Limited

M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311

 <http://www.tscheme.org> http://www.tscheme.org
------------------------------------

The information in this message and, if present, any attachments are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). The content of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is unauthorised and may be unlawful.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender as soon as practicable

 

 

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
Sent: 02 August 2012 00:35
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfpub] Auditors and the IPR Agreement

 

WebTrust has not currently signed the IPR agreement, but I've heard from Bryan that he will do so shortly.  Is one IPR agreement from WebTrust sufficient to allow participation from employees of KPMG, Deloitte, E&Y, and Protiviti?

 

Thanks,

 

Wayne

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120802/63564576/attachment-0004.html>