[cabfpub] Auditors and the IPR Agreement

[Sheehy, Don (CA - Toronto)]

Why don’t we just wait for Bryan walker to post the WebTrust response ? That should happen today  _ I’m sure that it should add clarity

Donald E. Sheehy, CA·CISA, CRISC, CIPP/C
Associate Partner, Enterprise Risk
Deloitte & Touche LLP


From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of tScheme Technical Manager
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:06 AM
To: 'Wayne Thayer'
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Auditors and the IPR Agreement

The questions would be: would they be bound by the WebTrust IPR ? I think not.

If KPMG made a statement about how they carry out tScheme audits (they are a tScheme-recognised assessor) – would that be covered under the tScheme IPR agreement ? What about if they said something about an ETSI audit – whose IPR agreement would that be under? NO – unworkable. They need to participate as themselves and, hence, follow the same process as other Members/Observers whichever they choose to become.

Regards
Richard
------------------------------------
Richard Trevorah
Technical Manager
tScheme Limited

M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311

http://www.tscheme.org
------------------------------------

The information in this message and, if present, any attachments are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). The content of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is unauthorised and may be unlawful.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender as soon as practicable



From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
Sent: 02 August 2012 00:35
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfpub] Auditors and the IPR Agreement

WebTrust has not currently signed the IPR agreement, but I've heard from Bryan that he will do so shortly.  Is one IPR agreement from WebTrust sufficient to allow participation from employees of KPMG, Deloitte, E&Y, and Protiviti?

Thanks,

Wayne

Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are
confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this
message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from
your system. Thank you.	



Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout
fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son
ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut
constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute
personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen,
réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre
utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est
strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu,
veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de
courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre
système. Merci.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120802/c1ae0562/attachment.html