[cabfcert_policy] RFC-3647-Formatted EV Guidelines

[Jeremy Rowley]

The previous version was never adopted because people didn’t like that most of the EV guidelines resided in Section 3.2. I don’t see a reason not to combine the two documents into a single policy.

 

From: Policyreview <policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 10:35 AM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>; policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfcert_policy] RFC-3647-Formatted EV Guidelines

 

This is great! At last, everyone will be able to see the great many overlaps between the BRs and the EVGs :-)

Dimitris.

On 3/5/2018 7:31 μμ, Ben Wilson wrote:

Here is that set of EV Guidelines Formatted according to RFC 3647.






_______________________________________________
Policyreview mailing list
Policyreview at cabforum.org <mailto:Policyreview at cabforum.org> 
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/policyreview

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20180503/2399fd7e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4984 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20180503/2399fd7e/attachment-0001.p7s>