[cabfcert_policy] Updated Draft of BRs based on meetings

[Mads Egil Henriksveen]

Hi Ben

My understanding of the status of this working group is that we are to "fill in the blanks" in the current BR with wordings from the ETSI, WebTrust, NIST CP etc.

However, I noticed during the Zurich F2F-meeting a need for formatting the Network Security Controls according to the RFC 3647 similar to the BR. Could this be accomplished by including the NetSec-requirements in this BR? And should this be given priority? I think both Webtrust and ETSI people was eager to get this done.

Regards
Mads


From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: 2. juli 2015 20:44
To: policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] Updated Draft of BRs based on meetings

Here is the updated version of the draft of the Baseline Requirements based on the last few meetings that we've had.   (Just an FYI - It doesn't yet reflect version 1.3.1 after Ballot 147 - Attorney Accountant Letter Changes.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150703/d345566e/attachment.html