[cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

[Tim Hollebeek]

I was going to suggest just waiting for the F2F, partly because the week of the 23rd is bad for me.

-Tim

________________________________
From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org [policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] on behalf of Dean Coclin [Dean_Coclin at symantec.com]
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:49
To: Ben Wilson; i-barreira at izenpe.net; policyreview at cabforum.org; Jody Cloutier (jodycl at microsoft.com)
Subject: Re: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

Thanks everyone that joined today’s call. Sorry about canceling the face to face meeting but believe me, you didn’t want to be in Boston today. The snow is still coming down, albeit lighter than earlier, and it’s very cold.

Thanks to Ben, I think we made good progress by reviewing section 5. If we can do the same on the section 6(?) on the next call, we could then present the formatting and those sections to the forum for approval.

Regarding a rescheduling of the meeting, Robin mentioned that he will be in the states the week of Feb 23rd.  But then I realized that our CABF F2F is only 2 weeks after that. Perhaps we should plan for a 3 hour meeting on Tuesday March 10th in Cupertino.  Thoughts?

Dean

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:10 AM
To: i-barreira at izenpe.net; policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

Here are different tables sorted by either RFC3647, ETSI or WebTrust.  I didn’t have time to merge in all of ETSI and WebTrust, so that is why some of those cells are empty (which is also why I sent the Excel spreadsheets in my previous email).

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 5:29 PM
To: i-barreira at izenpe.net<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.net>; policyreview at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

I wasn’t able to fill in as much as I’d have liked to.  Here is the raw data.  I’ll also prepare a comparison/mapping chart in Word/PDF for everyone’s reference.

From: i-barreira at izenpe.net<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.net> [mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.net]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:15 AM
To: Ben Wilson; policyreview at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview at cabforum.org>
Subject: RE: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

Ben,

The ETSI EN 319 401 is a generic document for all type of TSPs but not all TSPs issue certificates, for that, you can also have the EN 319 411-1 which has some “answers” to those “empty” cells.
When you have your task ready I can complete with the 411.
Check this checklist. It´s not finished (the last tab with the comparison with the CABF docs needs to be updated) but you can see where there´s a mix of use of the 401 and 411.

Regards


Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.net>
945067705

[Descripción: cid:image001.png at 01CE3152.B4804EB0]
ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

De: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Ben Wilson
Enviado el: sábado, 24 de enero de 2015 17:13
Para: policyreview at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview at cabforum.org>
Asunto: Re: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

I’m updating this document today,  so if you’re reviewing it today or tomorrow, let me know and I’ll send you a current version.  Otherwise, I’ll send everyone the updated version tomorrow afternoon, Mountain Time.

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org]<mailto:[mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org]> On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 10:44 PM
To: policyreview at cabforum.org<mailto:policyreview at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] Review Framework for Next Tuesday

Here is the template that I’m using for next week.  I still have to populate NIST provisions into the cells on the left and more CABF Network Security provisions into cells on the right.  The basis for the ETSI provisions was EN 319-401.  I’ll see if I’ve missed anything for ETSI and pull those provisions in.  And, if I get time to put the WebTrust criteria into a similar set of columns, I will.

________________________________

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150127/de6c15b4/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150127/de6c15b4/attachment-0001.png