[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
dzacharo at harica.gr
Wed Jul 22 09:03:55 MST 2020
On 2020-07-22 6:59 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware you changed it.
>
> I originally had it like that when I updated, but then reverted it (as
> you can see in the edit history), because it's inconsistent with the
> other links on the page - e.g. the GitHub redline. I was trying to
> prioritize consistency within the instructions (e.g. look at Compare
> Changes)
>
> I don't care one way or the other, but think we should at least be
> consistent. If you prefer the <code> block style, which forces a
> newline, would you please correct the other instances?
I see what you mean. I didn't notice the other cases. In any case, since
I will probably be the one going over these instructions, I think I will
revert to what you had :)
Thanks,
Dimitris.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:40 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-07-22 6:02 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>> Eh, that's no more broken than our existing sections on that
>> page. I intentionally mirrored that, as opposed to forcing it not
>> to be a hyperlink, so that the styles would be consistent.
>>
>> This definitely fits with Jos' remarks about our wiki stack ;)
>
> It's not broken because I fixed it :-)
>
> This is how it's displayed now.
>
>
>
> This was the previous version
>
>
>
> Dimitris.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:06 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
>> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020-07-21 7:27 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>>> Made edits and added screenshots. It looks like several
>>> steps had been omitted from my previous mail, so hopefully
>>> that helps.
>>
>> It sure does. Some text is broken under step 8, probably
>> because they are partially converted to hyperlinks.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dimitris.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>>> (HARICA) <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I would appreciate a review of the last two sections
>>> added in https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide
>>> before removing the "under construction".
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Dimitris.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2020-07-20 9:32 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was out of office today so apologies for replying
>>>> late. The result of the process is very good and I plan
>>>> on adding specific instructions on
>>>> https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide. Until
>>>> we reach the next milestone of automatically creating a
>>>> red-line, we can create a final version in the Pull
>>>> Request, and compare against the existing main branch.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the resulting docx redline BRs between
>>>> 1.7.0 and ballots SC30+31 using the two docx versions I
>>>> got from the links provided by Jos and Ryan.
>>>>
>>>> Does this look good to everyone? I will do a more
>>>> detailed review myself tomorrow morning (Greek time)
>>>> before posting to the public lists.
>>>>
>>>> Once again, a big thanks to Jos and Ryan for working on
>>>> this automation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Dimitris.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2020-07-20 8:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>>>>> Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so
>>>>> wasn't sure if you were sorted now with
>>>>> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>>>>> (HARICA) <dzacharo at harica.gr
>>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you both for the quick response. I recall
>>>>> the instructions posted by Ryan; unfortunately I
>>>>> am not so familiar with these processes. I will
>>>>> read them more carefully during the weekend. In
>>>>> the meantime, if you succeed in getting a combined
>>>>> SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs 1.7.0 sent by Jos
>>>>> earlier today, that would save me a lot of time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dimitris.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided
>>>>>> is the official DOCX from the official master
>>>>>> branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of the current
>>>>>> master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean
>>>>>> master version, against which you can compare
>>>>>> something from the ballot outputs to create a
>>>>>> binary redline. The trick is getting you
>>>>>> something from the SC30/SC31 branches to create
>>>>>> that redline against. 😊Ryan, I’ll have a look at
>>>>>> it today when I have a chance as well and see if
>>>>>> I can sort it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>>>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>>>>>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust
>>>>>> Verification
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:sleevi at google.com>
>>>>>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
>>>>>> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>>>> *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)"
>>>>>> <jopurvis at cisco.com> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>,
>>>>>> "infrastructure at cabforum.org"
>>>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>>> <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of
>>>>>> review period for SC30 and SC31
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
>>>>>> the instructions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi
>>>>>> <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our
>>>>>> discussions about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was
>>>>>> offering to get to it once I'm nearer to a
>>>>>> computer that can do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris
>>>>>> Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr
>>>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we have the artifacts from the current
>>>>>> official master branch? I can create a PR
>>>>>> on our official repo, that contains the
>>>>>> commits of both ballots if that
>>>>>> automatically creates new artifacts.
>>>>>> Then, I can use MS word to compare the
>>>>>> display the changes, thus creating a redline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would this work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DZ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis
>>>>>> (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced
>>>>>> uploaded artifacts from PRs /from
>>>>>> other people’s forks/, which makes
>>>>>> sense—I thought that was the
>>>>>> discussion. We’ve been producing
>>>>>> artifacts from PRs of branches
>>>>>> actually on the cabforum repo,
>>>>>> though, because a quick peruse of the
>>>>>> S3 bucket contents shows a folder for
>>>>>> each cabforum/documents branch up
>>>>>> through pandoc-travis-changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>>>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems
>>>>>> | Cryptographic Services
>>>>>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls
>>>>>> and Trust Verification
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi
>>>>>> <sleevi at google.com
>>>>>> <mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
>>>>>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>>>>>> *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)"
>>>>>> <jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>
>>>>>> *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>>>>>> (HARICA)" <dzacharo at harica.gr
>>>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>>,
>>>>>> "infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>"
>>>>>> <infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>>
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure]
>>>>>> Preparation of review period for SC30
>>>>>> and SC31
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos
>>>>>> Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dimitris,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the current version in Word
>>>>>> format, you can fetch it from
>>>>>> this link:
>>>>>> https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the same link as the PDF
>>>>>> from the front page of the CABF
>>>>>> repository, but with the
>>>>>> extension changed to docx (we
>>>>>> need to update the README on the
>>>>>> repository to reflect the new
>>>>>> formats and whatnot!).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the SC30 and SC31 ballots,
>>>>>> the Travis build completed
>>>>>> successfully, but it doesn't look
>>>>>> like it uploaded the resulting
>>>>>> artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that
>>>>>> something we need to fix? (Looks
>>>>>> like that used to be the default
>>>>>> and isn't anymore?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think there's some confusion. It
>>>>>> was never the default to upload
>>>>>> artifacts for PRs. This is the whole
>>>>>> discussion about the need to create a
>>>>>> dedicated branch within the main CABF
>>>>>> repository, then create a PR using
>>>>>> that, to have the artifact produced.
>>>>>> I'll see about doing that later today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Infrastructure mailing list
>>>> Infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Infrastructure mailing list
>>> Infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>> <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200722/01417387/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: aghpmjeafgiolfda.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11029 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200722/01417387/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: npjklcdpdjoijopf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15657 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200722/01417387/attachment-0003.png>
More information about the Infrastructure
mailing list