[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Fri Jul 17 08:49:38 MST 2020


https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
the instructions

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:

> Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions about this.
>
> The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering to get to it once
> I'm nearer to a computer that can do that.
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos <
> dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:
>
>> That's fine.
>>
>> Do we have the artifacts from the current official master branch? I can
>> create a PR on our official repo, that contains the commits of both ballots
>> if that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I can use MS word to
>> compare the display the changes, thus creating a redline.
>>
>> Would this work?
>>
>>
>> DZ.
>>
>> Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com>:
>>
>> Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded artifacts from PRs *from
>> other people’s forks*, which makes sense—I thought that was the
>> discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from PRs of branches actually on
>> the cabforum repo, though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket contents
>> shows a folder for each cabforum/documents branch up through
>> pandoc-travis-changes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com)
>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>> *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>
>> *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)" <dzacharo at harica.gr>, "
>> infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30
>> and SC31
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <
>> jopurvis at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dimitris,
>>
>> For the current version in Word format, you can fetch it from this link:
>>
>> https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>>
>> That's the same link as the PDF from the front page of the CABF
>> repository, but with the extension changed to docx (we need to update the
>> README on the repository to reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>>
>> For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis build completed successfully,
>> but it doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan,
>> is that something we need to fix? (Looks like that used to be the default
>> and isn't anymore?)
>>
>>
>>
>> I think there's some confusion. It was never the default to upload
>> artifacts for PRs. This is the whole discussion about the need to create a
>> dedicated branch within the main CABF repository, then create a PR using
>> that, to have the artifact produced. I'll see about doing that later today.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200717/22d536a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Infrastructure mailing list