[Infrastructure] Wiki Progress

Ben Wilson ben.wilson at digicert.com
Fri Mar 29 10:22:22 MST 2019


Agreed.  Thanks.

 

From: Infrastructure <infrastructure-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 9:19 AM
To: Daymion T. Reynolds <dreynolds at godaddy.com>
Cc: infrastructure at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [Infrastructure] Wiki Progress

 

Well done Jos!

 

I don't think the loss of edit history is much of a concern, and agree that keeping the old wiki around for a while would help to mitigate the problem. I'd suggest that we just include this info as a caveat when alerting members of the cutover to the new system.

 

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:18 AM Daymion T. Reynolds <dreynolds at godaddy.com <mailto:dreynolds at godaddy.com> > wrote:

Jos, 

Excellent work! Keep your script, we will likely need to pull the latest backup before the switch to make it current. Also, we could keep the old wiki up on a subdomain for a while for historical reference. Would this be satisfactory?

 

Regards,
Daymion

 

From: Infrastructure <infrastructure-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:infrastructure-bounces at cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis)
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:32 PM
To: infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org> 
Subject: [Infrastructure] Wiki Progress

 

After much Python hacking (man, am I glad I put those extra skill points in Python the last time I leveled up…), I managed to convince the moin2doku script to churn through the MoinMoin backup file Daymion provided and produce a Dokuwiki copy of the CABF wiki, complete with page content, media links, and all. The only down-side is that it hasn’t retained the edit history of the pages. The previous versions of pages are there, but there’s no handy “revisions” page in the Dokuwiki output to view them or say who changed what when. Consequently, when we cut over to the new wiki, we’d effectively be starting fresh—if someone wanted the information about the edit history for a page, we could reconstruct it as needed, but it won’t be there day-one.

 

How big an issue do we think that is? Would it be good to ask the Forum about it?

 

 

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com> )
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)

 

_______________________________________________
Infrastructure mailing list
Infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org> 
http://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20190329/28b54ee3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4934 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20190329/28b54ee3/attachment.p7s>


More information about the Infrastructure mailing list