[cabf_governance] Continuation of Governance Reform Work Group

[Kirk Hall]

Tim, you are right.  But I have scheduled time on Tuesday in Shanghai for a CABF Committee of the Whole to meet on remaining governance issues:

10:35

12:00

2

Forum Committee of the Whole: Governance and Bylaws Issues Pre-meeting (1) Governance WG or Subcommittee, (2) Review Bylaws Change List

Ben, Jos, Dimitris



From: Govreform [mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Govreform
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 12:36 PM
To: Dean Coclin <dean.coclin at digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Governance WG List <govreform at cabforum.org>; Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com>; Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabf_governance] Continuation of Governance Reform Work Group

There are zero remaining calls before Shanghai, and I believe that as a Legacy Working Group, this working group will no longer exist as of the Shanghai meeting.

-Tim

From: Govreform <govreform-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org>> On Behalf Of Dean Coclin via Govreform
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 10:12 AM
To: Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com<mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>; CA/Browser Forum Governance WG List <govreform at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>>; Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com<mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com>>
Subject: Re: [cabf_governance] Continuation of Governance Reform Work Group

Are we having a call today?

From: Govreform <govreform-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org>> On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Govreform
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:52 AM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com<mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com>>; CA/Browser Forum Governance WG List <govreform at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [cabf_governance] Continuation of Governance Reform Work Group

Sounds like we’re going to try in Shanghai to figure out our position on continuing this work and at what level (WG, Subcommittee, Random mob, Loose affiliation of ne’er-do-wells, etc.). That being the case, are we suspending our calls until after Shanghai?


--
Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com<mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)


From: Govreform <govreform-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org>> on behalf of CA/BF Governance Reform List <govreform at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>>
Reply-To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com<mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com>>, CA/BF Governance Reform List <govreform at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>>
Date: Wednesday, 5 September, 2018 at 00:43
To: CA/BF Governance Reform List <govreform at cabforum.org<mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>>
Subject: [cabf_governance] Continuation of Governance Reform Work Group

As I read the Bylaws, we have until October 3 to become a CWG committee or a chartered WG.  Otherwise we cease.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20181002/48be070b/attachment-0001.html>