[cabf_governance] [cabfpub] Draft Charter for Server Certificate Working Group

[Dean Coclin]

This was taken directly from our current bylaws but I see your point and this gives us an opportunity to fix it. 

Working group-can we make this change in our bylaw redlines?


Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 4:32 AM
To: Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>; Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Draft Charter for Server Certificate Working Group

On 25/10/17 15:26, Peter Bowen via Public wrote:
> Shouldn’t organizations that meet the Issuing CA or Root CA criteria 
> that also produce a software product intended for use by the general 
> public for browsing the Web securely have the option of whether to 
> participate as a CA Class or Browser Class member?  Otherwise I think 
> we will be down to Mozilla and Opera as Browser Class members.

Yes. I think the group membership criteria should be written in the
form: "An organization elegible to participate in the X Class should be..."

and then have a note at the bottom: "No organization may participate in more than one Class."

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/XDoAfzoQOrq3uO8jRYgKuLDFQBByc-_9cIRyvttglU4=?d=vOHXOwM0QC3TK3k8g8-CTDOfBr19xaDMsFPkm8x3aeOg16j1plYmu25poNSDD871DjBYrSTYPsjyZLdF9dy2Um6--ShpEBFZEkq7AmSEfHTkJ-sAZP7HPpQ8qa5Rt5a08QMk-N5x8-ROCPLy7HfKVTAR8RgYSsUgI7ZeEjFSFWWwPSufcv_z2Srg0zYCPw6hwxb4mf7M9gUUNzEaZvQkY3lxUNhfmIEOS4BaPzJ7jqB-p02UZsL-dTPclKbKp2eQ3rFns8Ka2bmTMwRNvcDG026O5_OdM0vdKTciNogeFkSDdnNyHlkIpANgunHqGRb-1S_-ybs0MyadbEJRbUWZr_P5iA5ypEpHNvbUFsBhnI0M8d-G-lcSbXYyvOGsvX-vUCn3ueB9Wbxn3TIJLvq_aqMBB3AkG1deD2h3kJ5kuHE4npI%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpublic