[cabf_governance] Ballot 206 comments

[Gervase Markham]

On 01/11/17 20:23, Virginia Fournier wrote:
> Perhaps you could propose some language that would allow the level of
> transparency you desire, while not burdening the WGs with
> micromanagement of their communications.  Thanks.

How about something like:

All Working Group mailing lists should be managed in the same fashion as
the Public Mail List, and other methods of communication employed by the
Working Group should exhibit a similar level of transparency as
appropriate to their nature. This should include public archives for
written methods of communication.

Gerv