[cabf_governance] Agenda and start time for next week's F2F

[Dean Coclin]

As discussed on today's call, we will move the start time to 9:30am PDT to
accommodate the morning travelers from out of town. For a strawman agenda,
I propose the following. Please feel free to edit. I believe our guest
speaker can only do morning (right, Virginia?) so although this is not the
order I would have preferred, I think it's valuable to get his input
whenever he can give it:

 

9:30-9:45              Introductions, Logistics, Remote user connections,
Wi-Fi, Plans for the day. Read Ballot 165 (formation of the working group)

9:45-10:30           Review outline sent by Dean on 7/20. Review Ben's email
of 7/22. Settle on what issues we are trying to solve, why are they issues,
etc.

10:30-11:00         Guest speaker from Apple-David Singer, W3C participant.
What works/what doesn't in W3C format? Definition of participation.

11:00-11:15         Break

11:15-12:15         Guest speaker, continued. Group discussion.

12:15-1:00           Lunch Break

1:00-2:00              Who are the constituencies/stakeholders for various
groups (SMIME, Code Signing)? How to get "skin in the game".

2:00-3:00              What proposals does the team have to satisfy the
issues identified above? Review what's been submitted so far. Tradeoffs.

3:00-3:15              Break

3:15-5:00              Continue discussing proposals with regard to voting,
participation, IPR, scope. Focus on 1 WG as a model and "test" out a
proposal.

5:00-5:30              Recommendations to move forward

5:30pm                 Adjourn 

 

At the end of this meeting, we should make sure we have concrete answers to
the following questions:

 

1. Why are we doing this, what is the need for reform?

2. What do we gain by doing this?

3. What do we get that we can't get today?

4. How can get participation in other groups? 

5. How can we define who has "skin in the game"?

6. After listening to the W3C model and discussing proposed options, is
there one that comes across as more favorable?

 

We should set a goal to have something ready for forum presentation and
discussion at the Seattle meeting in October.

 

Thanks,
Dean

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20160802/e7ee36c3/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5723 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20160802/e7ee36c3/attachment.bin