[Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
Martijn Katerbarg
martijn.katerbarg at sectigo.com
Thu Dec 8 12:40:44 UTC 2022
I’ve continued from the point where Dimitris left off. I’ve also given it another pass and updated a few more sections. Every update has an editor note added to it, and is now available in GitHub.
The one section remaining to be done, is section 7.1.4.2.3. This section references BR Section 3.2 a number of times, so we appear to need to do a complete comparison of CSCBR Section 3.2 and BR Section 3.2, and import anything that’s “missing but relevant”.
I’ve also discovered 2 potential conflicts, which are called out in the text. I’ll add github comments on these so we they become more visible to everyone, and people can chime in on the items easily.
Regards,
Martijn
From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
Sent: Monday, 5 December 2022 11:02
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <dzacharo at harica.gr>; cscwg-public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dimitris, I’ll allot time this week to proceed from 7.1.4
From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public
Sent: Monday, 5 December 2022 10:34
To: cscwg-public at cabforum.org <mailto:cscwg-public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I continued to work in this project and imported requirements all the way to section 7.1.4 (without working on 7.1.4) and would appreciate it if someone could pick up from there. The remaining references to a "BR Section" are very few but at the same time the editor must check every BR section that was not explicitly referenced by the CSBRs and import that language.
Please check for additional comments/concerns that need to be addressed, marked with the word "EDITOR".
Thanks,
Dimitris.
On 30/10/2022 1:21 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public wrote:
Dear friends,
With the publication of CSBRs version 3.2, I created a branch and started importing TLS BRs (already completed sections 1 and 2). You can monitor the progress in:
* https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/blob/importTLSBRrefs/docs/CSBR.md <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fcode-signing%2Fblob%2FimportTLSBRrefs%2Fdocs%2FCSBR.md&data=05%7C01%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7Cb21e19797fc3421a077308dad6a7c401%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638058313293596224%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LnBHnnGIT3SJSGHOUyZz3%2BccSJpWvg1ut8SZYLoIvD0%3D&reserved=0>
Since we will make a full pass of the TLS BRs and EVGs, I believe it is a good opportunity to import the requirements from the latest TLS BRs/EVGs (1.8.4/1.7.9 respectively). If we encounter some controversial requirements between the latest versions and the ones currently referenced that need more discussion, we will bring this back to the WG to discuss/resolve.
Digicert (Corey) and Sectigo (Martijn) have already declared their intent to assist in this process. If there are more volunteers, please reply to this thread so we can possibly break-down the sections.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best regards,
Dimitris.
_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
Cscwg-public at cabforum.org <mailto:Cscwg-public at cabforum.org>
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcscwg-public&data=05%7C01%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7Cb21e19797fc3421a077308dad6a7c401%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638058313293596224%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qhs0l%2B0l8vSDqeiu024Id%2BQ6GvOE2RJ1LVQrwu4q25g%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20221208/12fcf8d9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20221208/12fcf8d9/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the Cscwg-public
mailing list