[Cscwg-public] NetSec WG

[Bruce Morton]

I do agree that the NetSec document should be managed at the Forum level. The reason is that it is called out by both the SSL BR and the CSBR. I also assume that the S/MIME BR will also call it out. Since it would appear that all Application Software Suppliers want the CAs to use this document, then it should be applied at the Forum level.

In addition, WebTrust should already split the audit criteria away from the SSL BR audit criteria. NetSec should have its own audit criteria, so that it can be called out directly by the CSBRs.


Bruce.

From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Dean Coclin via Cscwg-public
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 11:34 AM
To: Ben Wilson <bwilson at mozilla.com>; cscwg-public at cabforum.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Cscwg-public] NetSec WG

WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
________________________________
I think it’s certainly something we could add to our next meeting agenda to discuss.

Dean

From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org>> On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Cscwg-public
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 10:24 AM
To: cscwg-public at cabforum.org<mailto:cscwg-public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [Cscwg-public] NetSec WG

Would members of the Code Signing Certificate WG be interested in and support a ballot to charter a NetSec WG that would cover net-sec issues for the other working groups (SCWG, SMIME, etc.)?
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20210927/2a3719b8/attachment-0001.html>