[Cscwg-public] FW: Voting Begins: Ballot CSC-8 v3: Update to Revocation response mechanisms. key protection for EV certificates, and clean-up of 11.2.1 & Appendix B

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) dzacharo at harica.gr
Wed Mar 31 15:09:16 UTC 2021


Unfortunately noone noticed this typo before the voting period started, 
so we are forced to include it in the Maintenance Guideline if it is 
voted on and then have a subsequent ballot to fix it, or change our 
votes to fail the ballot and start over.

Thanks,
Dimitris.

On 31/3/2021 3:51 μ.μ., Bruce Morton via Cscwg-public wrote:
>
> Reminder that Ballot CSC-8 voting period ends on 1 April 2021. Please 
> vote soon, so we can meet minimum quorum.
>
> Note that it has been shown that there is a typo in the ballot. I am 
> confirming that we can fix that typo when we create the final document 
> for IP review.
>
> Thanks, Bruce.
>
> *From:* Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of 
> *Ian McMillan via Cscwg-public
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:50 PM
> *To:* cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Cscwg-public] Voting Begins: Ballot CSC-8 v3: 
> Update to Revocation response mechanisms. key protection for EV 
> certificates, and clean-up of 11.2.1 & Appendix B
>
> WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust.
> DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know 
> the content is safe.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Ballot CSC-8 v3: Update to Revocation response mechanisms. key 
> protection for EV certificates, and clean-up of 11.2.1 & Appendix B*
>
> Purpose of this ballot:
>
> Address the changes needed in the Baseline Requirement for the 
> Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Code Signing Certificates 
> v2.2 for:
>
>  1. Making OCSP optional with CRLs being required (13.2.1, 13.2.2,
>     Appendix B: 3C, 5C)
>  2. Added Common Criteria EAL 4+ to the supported key protection
>     crypto modules for EV certificates in light of support for RSA
>     3072 keys (16.3.2)
>  3. Clean up of Appendix B[3C] & [5C] (AIA value requirements) and
>     section 11.2.1 contradiction with RFC3161
>
> In Appendix B, it was noted that the requirements for the Timestamping 
> (5C) and Code Signing (3C) certificates had AIA value requirements to 
> include the root certificate URL, but that should be the issuing CA 
> URL. This has been included in this ballot.
>
> Corey Bonnell noted a contradiction in the section 11.2.1 regarding 
> Timestamp in the clause “and appends it own Timestamp Certificate” is 
> an unconditional requirement for a timestamp response to include the 
> TSA certificate chain, but this conflicts with RFC3161 making this 
> clause a conditional requirement based on the certReq field (missing 
> or set to false). This clean up has the clause removed from section 
> 11.2.1.
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Ian McMillan of Microsoft, 
> and endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and Bruce Morton of 
> EnTrust.
>
> --- MOTION BEGINS ---
>
> This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and 
> Management of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates" version 2.2 
> according to the attached redline.
>
> --- MOTION ENDS ---
>
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
>
> Discussion (7 days)
> Start Time: 2021-03-18, 17:30 Eastern Time (US)
> End Time: not before 2021-03-25, 17:30 Eastern Time (US)
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> Start Time: 2021-03-25, 17:30 Eastern Time (US)
>
> End Time: 2021-04-01, 17:30 Eastern Time (US)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cscwg-public mailing list
> Cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20210331/916f6da7/attachment.html>


More information about the Cscwg-public mailing list