[Cscwg-public] Suspension of code signing certs
Adriano Santoni
adriano.santoni at staff.aruba.it
Tue Feb 2 09:37:33 UTC 2021
All,
this is probably an old matter, but I could not solve my doubts browsing
the past posts.
I suppose, but I am not certain, that - as for SSL Server certificates -
Code Signing certificates must not be suspended (that is, there must not
be a CRLReason "certificateHold" in a CRL entry). But maybe I am wrong,
as I cannot find the relevant language in the Code Signing BR. Anybody,
please point me at the right spot in the document.
TIA
Adriano
Il 01/02/2021 10:32, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public ha
scritto:
>
> According to the requirements, and section 13.2.1:
>
> "CAs MUST provide OCSP responses for Code Signing Certificates and
> Timestamp Certificates for the time period specified in their CPS,
> which MUST be at least 10 years after the expiration of the certificate"
>
> However, according to Certificate Consumer policies, either CRL or
> OCSP is required to be used.
>
> I would like to ask for Members to consider requiring either CRL or
> OCSP information to be required in end-entity certificates used for
> Time-stamping. The rationale is that Time-stamping Certificates are
> very few compared to other end-entity certificates and CRLs should be
> considered sufficient because their size is not significant.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts, concerns or objections.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Dimitris.
> _______________________________________________
> Cscwg-public mailing list
> Cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20210202/22882bc2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4557 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20210202/22882bc2/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Cscwg-public
mailing list