<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">People should also review previous discussions of this issue at CABF. We have had at least two previous long discussions of the issue, one on VWG call and one at a Server Certificate F2F; Shanghai IIRC but I could be wrong. The Princeton
folks were even invited to a VWG meeting and presented their results shortly after they published them. So there’s quite a bit of previous discussion out there already.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Tim<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Validation <validation-bounces@cabforum.org> <b>
On Behalf Of </b>Ben Wilson via Validation<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 13, 2022 2:37 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Josh Aas <josh@letsencrypt.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> CABforum3 <validation@cabforum.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabf_validation] BGP hijacking protections<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Great, thanks! <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 10:44 AM Josh Aas <<a href="mailto:josh@letsencrypt.org">josh@letsencrypt.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Great timing for this question. We are working with the folks from Princeton on a proposal that we plan to send to this list in the next couple of months.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:26 PM Ben Wilson via Validation <<a href="mailto:validation@cabforum.org" target="_blank">validation@cabforum.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">All,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do we need to somehow add something in the BRs to better protect subscribers against BGP hijacking? See
<a href="https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/lxiA7zcKLws/m/-1imDKu4AQAJ" target="_blank">
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/lxiA7zcKLws/m/-1imDKu4AQAJ</a> and
<a href="https://www.coinbase.com/blog/celer-bridge-incident-analysis" target="_blank">
https://www.coinbase.com/blog/celer-bridge-incident-analysis</a>. Is there something that CAs and subscribers can arrange ahead of time to prevent this kind of attack from succeeding? Could the CA/Browser Forum adopt something in the BRs that would be of benefit?
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ben<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Validation mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Validation@cabforum.org" target="_blank">Validation@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation" target="_blank">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<br>
-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Josh Aas<br>
Executive Director<br>
Internet Security Research Group<br>
Let's Encrypt: A Free, Automated, and Open CA<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>