<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Yep, that’s correct and would be fine.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-Tim<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='mso-ligatures:none'>From:</span></b><span style='mso-ligatures:none'> Smcwg-public <smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Smcwg-public<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, December 13, 2023 6:04 AM<br><b>To:</b> smcwg-public@cabforum.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Smcwg-public] CAA for S/MIME<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 6/12/2023 7:59 μ.μ., Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public wrote:<span style='mso-ligatures:none'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal>Hello:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Here is an updated diff for the CAA text following our discussions today:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-As suggested by Cade, to add the TTL/8hr reference consistent with the TLS BR.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-To add the implementation dates in 2.2 and 4.2<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'><a href="https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/srdavidson/smime/compare/241e92cde85c25d7e0d4a5c70118ecadacd4d72b...43228a41a5cc99a3301c4066621787cde7e0f79a___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyZDA0OTA4NDA2ZjE5MWNmOGZjYjc0NzVjZWI0YjA1Yjo2OmViNWE6OGYwMTAwMTQ5OTNkZDJhMmVlNGJkYTI2NjUyNWM0YWMyNmE4YmU4ZDcxNGExNmZhYTdhZTc5MzJkODY5OTVmYzpoOkY" title="Protected by Avanan: https://github.com/srdavidson/smime/compare/241e92cde85c25d7e0d4a5c70118ecadacd4d72b...43228a41a5cc99a3301c4066621787cde7e0f79a">https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://github.com/srdavidson/smime/compare/241e92cde85c25d7e0d4a5c70118ecadacd4d72b...43228a41a5cc99a3301c4066621787cde7e0f79a___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyZDA0OTA4NDA2ZjE5MWNmOGZjYjc0NzVjZWI0YjA1Yjo2OjI2ODA6Zjc0NjUyZGZlNmEzZGY2MTliMWVlZDE0ZDg2Y2EwYTY5YzFjMzc2MGU2MzhmZDRmYTkxMjZjOWQ1MGNmNzY0Zjp0OkY</a></span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'>The plan will be to move this to ballot at the start of 2024, so I encourage CAs to engage with operations teams and/or software vendors on the suitability of the implementation dates.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'>Best regards, Stephen</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-ligatures:none'><br>I would actually prefer that we remove references to RFC 8659 and only refer to RFC 9495 which is applicable to S/MIME. RFC 8659 is part of the Normative References (section 8.1 of RFC 9495) so we are good.<br><br>Dimitris.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></body></html>