<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><font face="Calibri">Ashish,</font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri">my intent would not be to prohibit anything,
        but rather to make two types of certificates (OV, SV)
        distinguishable that otherwise are not, and to make the S/MIME
        baseline requirements consistent with the definition of
        Sponsor-Validated.<br>
        <br>
        Furthermore, I don't understand why what I'm proposing could
        cause problems for those who need, for their legacy use case,
        S/MIME certificates that simultaneously contain
        Subject.organizationName AND <i>any type </i>of email address
        in the Subject.commonName (like <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:department@example.com">department@example.com</a> or
        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com">ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com</a> to quote your examples), plus of
        course locality and organizationIdentifier. In fact, in such use
        case you can very well use OV-type S/MIME certificates. Don't
        you?<br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri">Adriano</font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri"><br>
      </font></p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 20/10/2023 10:20, Ashish Dhiman ha
      scritto:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:KL1PR03MB83179F73DE6B81E3A51689138CDBA@KL1PR03MB8317.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator"
        content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}code
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        font-family:"Courier New";}pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";}span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:Consolas;}span.EmailStyle23
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style>
      <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <title></title>
      <div align="center">
        <table width="30%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="1">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td valign="top" bgcolor="#ffff00"> <span
                  style="color: red;">NOTICE:</span> Pay attention -
                external email - Sender is <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com">ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com</a>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt">Respected: CA/B – S/MIME Forum
            Members.
             <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt">I feel the problem that we are
            trying to solve
            by prohibiting email address from CN in Legacy will only
            make
            things complex rather than solve it. During our discussion,
            the
            intent for legacy, always was to have minimum impact on
            existing
            practices and give time for wider industry to move to
            multipurpose
            or strict profile. I feel, we are defeating the whole
            purpose of
            legacy with suggested change, as I am trying to understand
            how;
            eliminating email address from CN will help us differentiate
            a
            sponsor profile from organization profile. As, Technically,
            people
            can still use <a href="mailto:department@example.com"
              target="_blank" title="mailto:department@example.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">department@example.com</a>
            in
            sponsor profile as email address and also use <a
              href="mailto:ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com" target="_blank"
              title="mailto:ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">ashish.dhiman@globalsign.com</a>
            in Organization Profile as email address.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt">On the other hand, this change will
            also deviate
            from current practices for CN use for legacy use cases Also,
            during
            implementation, we see in most of the cases; email address
            used in
            Sponsor profiles are correct. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt">I think removing email in CN makes
            legacy no
            longer like legacy and seems to make it stricter than multi
            and
            strict where its allowed. There is also no indication that
            the
            intent for changes, will be achieved without mandatory use
            of Given
            Name and Sur Name in Legacy profile, which is again a big
            change
            considering legacy intent, and make these profiles similar
            to multi
            and strict version. Overall, this change seems to defeat its
            goal
            of supporting wider ecosystem for a
            while. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt">Ashish<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div
style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"
                  lang="EN-US">From:</span></b> <span
                style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-US">Smcwg-public
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org"><smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org></a> <b>On Behalf
                  Of</b>
                Adriano Santoni via Smcwg-public<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 19, 2023 5:00 PM<br>
                <b>To:</b> Martijn Katerbarg
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:martijn.katerbarg@sectigo.com"><martijn.katerbarg@sectigo.com></a>;
                SMIME Certificate Working Group
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"><smcwg-public@cabforum.org></a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Smcwg-public] [External Sender] Re:
                Re: Re: SV
                certificates devoid of individual attributes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p>I have created the pull request below. <o:p></o:p></p>
        <p><a href="https://github.com/cabforum/smime/pull/218"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/cabforum/smime/pull/218</a><o:p></o:p></p>
        <p>Even if there exists some niche legacy uses cases, I believe
          it
          would be highly preferable to avoid allowing SV certificates
          that
          do not match the SV definition and are indistinguishable from
          OV
          certs. Besides, it appears that in such particular contexts OV
          certificates would still meet the need.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p>Looking for endorsers.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p>Adriano<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Il 16/10/2023 18:38, Martijn Katerbarg ha
            scritto:<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">Happy to work with
              you on that. I do wonder what the cause and original
              intent behind
              this was.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">I wonder if they key
              lies in the Note added to section 7.1.4.2.5:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">“</span>Legacy
            Generation profiles MAY omit the <code>subject:givenName</code>,
            <code>subject:surname</code>, and <code>subject:pseudonym</code>
            attributes and include only the <code>subject:commonName</code>
            as
            described in <a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/smime/blob/main/SBR.md#71422-subject-distinguished-name-fields"
              moz-do-not-send="true">
              Section 7.1.4.2.2(a)</a>.<span lang="EN-US">”</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"
              lang="EN-US">Could it be that the original intent here was
              that subject:givenName, subject:surname and
              subject:pseudonym are
              allowed to be left out, <b>only</b> if subject:commonName
              was
              included <b>and</b> had either the pseudonym or
              givenName+surname
              in it? <br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </span> <o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"
              lang="EN-US">I
              could see that as a possible legacy use case, with the
              intend to
              deprecate. I’m not sure if any CA needs that use case at
              current
              though.<br>
              <br>
              Regards,<br>
              <br>
              Martijn</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
            <div>
              <div
style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span
                      style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:</span></b>
                  <span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Smcwg-public
                    <a href="mailto:smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org></a>
                    on behalf of Adriano Santoni via Smcwg-public <a
                      href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><smcwg-public@cabforum.org></a><br>
                    <b>Date:</b> Monday, 16 October 2023 at 18:09<br>
                    <b>To:</b> <a
                      href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">smcwg-public@cabforum.org</a>
                    <a href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><smcwg-public@cabforum.org></a><br>
                    <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Smcwg-public] [External Sender]
                    Re: Re: SV
                    certificates devoid of individual attributes</span><o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <div
style="border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt">
                <p class="MsoNormal"
                  style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FAFA03">
                  <span style="color:black">CAUTION: This email
                    originated from
                    outside of the organization. Do not click links or
                    open attachments
                    unless you recognize the sender and know the content
                    is
                    safe.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p>I would suggest an amendment in order to correct this
                  unintended
                  result; I'm available to dratf a proposal it if there
                  are any
                  endorsers.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p>Adriano<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Il
                      16/10/2023
                      17:17, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Smcwg-public ha
                      scritto:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                  <div align="center">
                    <table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width:30.0%"
                      width="30%" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0"
                      border="1">
                      <tbody>
                        <tr>
                          <td
style="background:yellow;padding:1.5pt 1.5pt 1.5pt 1.5pt" valign="top">
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                style="font-size:11.0pt;color:red">NOTICE:</span>
                              <span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Pay
                                attention - external email -
                                Sender is <a
href="mailto:0100018b3910b1a1-5f63e11d-cb86-4599-8385-07abf817d4d1-000000@amazonses.com"
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
0100018b3910b1a1-5f63e11d-cb86-4599-8385-07abf817d4d1-000000@amazonses.com</a></span>
                              <o:p></o:p></p>
                          </td>
                        </tr>
                      </tbody>
                    </table>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
                    align="center">
                    <span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">I
                        agree
                        it's not a good thing. The SV profile was to
                        support certificates
                        that include attributes of individuals validated
                        by the Enterprise
                        RA. If we allow those to be missing, making it
                        effectively an OV
                        Certificate, seems like an unintended result.<br>
                        <br>
                        Best regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                    </span> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
                  <pre>Smcwg-public mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
                  <pre><a href="mailto:Smcwg-public@cabforum.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Smcwg-public@cabforum.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
                  <pre><a
href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>