<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><font face="Calibri">As a first idea, how about rewording that
        note in §7.1.4.2.5 the following way?</font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">“</span>Legacy Generation profiles MAY omit
            the <code>subject:givenName</code>, <code>subject:surname</code>,
            and <code>subject:pseudonym</code> attributes and include
            only the <code>subject:commonName</code> as described in <a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/smime/blob/main/SBR.md#71422-subject-distinguished-name-fields">Section
              7.1.4.2.2(a)</a>, <font color="#0000ff">provided that a
              Personal Name (see Section 3.1.2) is included in <font
                face="Calibri"><code>subject:commonName</code></font>.</font><span
              lang="EN-US">”</span></p>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri">Adriano</font></p>
    <p><font face="Calibri"><br>
      </font></p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 16/10/2023 18:38, Martijn Katerbarg
      ha scritto:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:MW5PR17MB6012542D83AE8D55E57024CAE3D7A@MW5PR17MB6012.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator"
        content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}code
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        font-family:"Courier New";}pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";}span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:"Consolas",serif;}span.EmailStyle21
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">Happy to work with you on that. I do wonder
            what the cause and original intent behind this was.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">I wonder if they key lies in the Note added to
            section 7.1.4.2.5:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">“</span>Legacy Generation profiles MAY omit the
          <code>subject:givenName</code>, <code>subject:surname</code>,
          and <code>subject:pseudonym</code> attributes and include
          only the <code>subject:commonName</code> as described in <a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/smime/blob/main/SBR.md#71422-subject-distinguished-name-fields"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Section 7.1.4.2.2(a)</a>.<span
            lang="EN-US">”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-US">Could
            it be that the original intent here was that
            subject:givenName, subject:surname and subject:pseudonym are
            allowed to be left out, <b>only</b> if subject:commonName
            was included <b>and</b> had either the pseudonym or
            givenName+surname in it?  <br>
            <br>
            <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-US">I
            could see that as a possible legacy use case, with the
            intend to deprecate. I’m not sure if any CA needs that use
            case at current though.<br>
            <br>
            Regards,<br>
            <br>
            Martijn<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
          <div>
            <div
style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span
                    style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span
                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Smcwg-public
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org"><smcwg-public-bounces@cabforum.org></a> on behalf of
                  Adriano Santoni via Smcwg-public
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"><smcwg-public@cabforum.org></a><br>
                  <b>Date: </b>Monday, 16 October 2023 at 18:09<br>
                  <b>To: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org">smcwg-public@cabforum.org</a>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org"><smcwg-public@cabforum.org></a><br>
                  <b>Subject: </b>Re: [Smcwg-public] [External Sender]
                  Re: Re: SV certificates devoid of individual
                  attributes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div
style="border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt">
              <p class="MsoNormal"
                style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FAFA03"><span
                  style="color:black">CAUTION: This email originated
                  from outside of the organization. Do not click links
                  or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
                  and know the content is safe.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <div>
              <p>I would suggest an amendment in order to correct this
                unintended result; I'm available to dratf a proposal it
                if there are any endorsers.<o:p></o:p></p>
              <p>Adriano<o:p></o:p></p>
              <p><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Il
                    16/10/2023 17:17, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via
                    Smcwg-public ha scritto:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                <div align="center">
                  <table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width:30.0%"
                    width="30%" cellpadding="0" border="1">
                    <tbody>
                      <tr>
                        <td
style="background:yellow;padding:1.5pt 1.5pt 1.5pt 1.5pt" valign="top">
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                              style="font-size:11.0pt;color:red">NOTICE:</span><span
                              style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> Pay
                              attention - external email - Sender is <a
href="mailto:0100018b3910b1a1-5f63e11d-cb86-4599-8385-07abf817d4d1-000000@amazonses.com"
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">0100018b3910b1a1-5f63e11d-cb86-4599-8385-07abf817d4d1-000000@amazonses.com</a>
                            </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                    </tbody>
                  </table>
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
                  align="center"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">I
                      agree it's not a good thing. The SV profile was to
                      support certificates that include attributes of
                      individuals validated by the Enterprise RA. If we
                      allow those to be missing, making it effectively
                      an OV Certificate, seems like an unintended
                      result.<br>
                      <br>
                      Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><br>
                    <br>
                    <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre>Smcwg-public mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre><a href="mailto:Smcwg-public@cabforum.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Smcwg-public@cabforum.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre><a
href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsmcwg-public&data=05%7C01%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C31f1becfe83840c453df08dbce6237da%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638330693474194168%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=u6pfGzIuJyhqtuQF4yntzYBFtn0RP2ndc%2FAR2X4PaIU%3D&reserved=0"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>