<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Voting begins for ballot SC-74.<br>
    <h1 class="break-text" id="bkmrk-page-title">SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS
      structure according to RFC 3647</h1>
    <h2 id="bkmrk-summary">Summary</h2>
    <p id="bkmrk-the-tls-baseline-req">The TLS Baseline Requirements
      require in section 2.2 that:</p>
    <p id="bkmrk-%22the-certificate-pol"><em>"The Certificate Policy
        and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in
        accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required
        by RFC 3647."</em></p>
    <p id="bkmrk-the-intent-of-this-l">The intent of this language was
      to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents contain a similar
      structure, making it easier to review and compare against the BRs.
      However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that
      CAs should follow. After several discussions in the <a
href="https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html"
        moz-do-not-send="true">SCWG Public Mailing List</a> and F2F
      meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the
      existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section
      6 of RFC 3647.</p>
    <p id="bkmrk-the-following-motion">The following motion has been
      proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and endorsed by Aaron
      Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert). <br>
    </p>
    <p id="bkmrk-you-can-view-and-com">You can view the github pull
      request representing this ballot <a
        href="https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503"
        moz-do-not-send="true">here</a>. <br>
    </p>
    <h2 id="bkmrk-motion-begins">Motion Begins</h2>
    <p id="bkmrk-modify-the-%22baseline">MODIFY the "Baseline
      Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted
      TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified in
      the following redline:<br>
    </p>
    <ul id="bkmrk-https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fc">
      <li class="null"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae"
          moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae</a>
        <br>
      </li>
    </ul>
    <h2 id="bkmrk-motion-ends">Motion Ends</h2>
    <p id="bkmrk-this-ballot-proposes">This ballot proposes a Final
      Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot
      is as follows:</p>
    <h4 id="bkmrk-discussion-%2811%2B-days">Discussion (at least 7 days)</h4>
    <ul id="bkmrk-start-time%3A-2024-01-">
      <li class="null">Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC</li>
      <li class="null">End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC</li>
    </ul>
    <h4 id="bkmrk-vote-for-approval-%287">Vote for approval (7 days)</h4>
    <ul id="bkmrk-start-time%3A-tbd-end-">
      <li class="null">Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC</li>
      <li class="null">End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC</li>
    </ul>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>