<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font face="Calibri">Thank you </font>Jaime , but <font
face="Calibri">I had already checked that.</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">At that link I can only find the following
very short exchange between chrisbn and sleevi:<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">
<blockquote type="cite">@chrisbn chrisbn May 13, 2022<br>
Yes, I wonder about the order of fields not in this list.<br>
I understand the hierarchy to order logic, but is the order
defined in Section 7.1.4.2 based on an existing specification,
or how did we come to this ordering?<br>
@sleevi sleevi May 13, 2022<br>
It is based on the definitions within X.509 and X.520, given
these fields are generally geographical in nature.<br>
That said, there’s definitely flexibility here to get us
closer to consistency among CAs, which is a key point of
profiling, so if there are changes and concerns, it’s totally
appropriate to highlight.</blockquote>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">That does not seem to clarify much, so I
suppose there is more somewhere else.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">No discussion of the mailing list? No
discussion in SCWG calls?<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Adriano</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 21/03/2024 09:52, Jaime Hablutzel ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:478B7BEF-2E4A-4DA0-BFE7-63D74038FA3D@wisekey.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
The discussion in <a
href="https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/36#discussion_r872103477"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/36#discussion_r872103477</a> could
help.<br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On 21 Mar 2024, at 09:39, Adriano Santoni via
Servercert-wg <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org"><servercert-wg@cabforum.org></a> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>
<p><font face="Calibri">All, can anyone help me find the
past email discussion, or at least the rationale that
someone wrote somewhere (e.g. on Github?), supporting
the Subject attributes encoding relative order
requirement that was introduced in BR 2.0.0 (Ballot
SC-062) ? </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">I am talking about §7.1.4.2
Subject Attribute Encoding, and specifically about
this language:<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">"CAs that include attributes in
the Certificate subject field that are listed in the
table below<br>
SHALL encode those attributes in the relative order as
they appear in the table and follow the<br>
specified encoding requirements for the attribute."<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">I do not recall, and cannot find,
a discussion on this mailing list on this particular
topic. Maybe I just missed a whole bunch of email
messages due to some otherwise undetected email
problem. I also did a search on Github, starting from
the links provided at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://cabforum.org/2023/03/17/ballot-sc62v2-certificate-profiles-update/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://cabforum.org/2023/03/17/ballot-sc62v2-certificate-profiles-update/</a>),
but was unable to figure out who proposed it and,
above all, for what reason.<br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri">Adriano</font><br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Servercert-wg mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Servercert-wg@cabforum.org">Servercert-wg@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cabforum.org_mailman_listinfo_servercert-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=-bX5hBm1IdRDykQ-dBR8tsFRCM4v1VXUyG7RZa2WqPY&m=TmnUymVu4aN7JJUi7E4FNf5W7JAuYX7-j6JtyhXK9EAAxJqhk7RvTa9sOsMmibge&s=pzZ-HMcq_CggzRO87gqT5_XxYy9n5hIbsxrERd7c_so&e=">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cabforum.org_mailman_listinfo_servercert-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=-bX5hBm1IdRDykQ-dBR8tsFRCM4v1VXUyG7RZa2WqPY&m=TmnUymVu4aN7JJUi7E4FNf5W7JAuYX7-j6JtyhXK9EAAxJqhk7RvTa9sOsMmibge&s=pzZ-HMcq_CggzRO87gqT5_XxYy9n5hIbsxrERd7c_so&e=</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>