<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Apologies for not reviewing this ballot sooner.<br>
<br>
I am a bit confused with the redline changes, especially in the BRG.
Based on the GitHub link, the comparison of the BRs is against
version 2.0.0, not 2.0.2 as described in the summary of this ballot.
<br>
<br>
HARICA is uncertain about the changes introduced and therefore votes
"no" to ballot SC65.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/3/2024 5:33 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira
via Servercert-wg wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0100018e0a19ab8d-2f3fffc4-2e11-4dd4-8ddc-6b40c8819cef-000000@email.amazonses.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator"
content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style>@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#467886;
text-decoration:underline;}p.null, li.null, div.null
{mso-style-name:null;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}span.EstiloCorreo23
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<div>
<p><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"
lang="EN-US">Summary: </span></strong><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-this-ballot-aims-to-"><span lang="EN-US">The
Extended Validation Certificates guidelines (EVGs) were
developed and written in a specific format. Since then,
the RFC 3647 has been the basis (and the de-facto
standard) for the CA/Browser Forum to develop other
documents.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">This ballot aims to update the EVGs to
follow the RFC 3647 format without changing any content,
just moving current sections to those defined in the RFC
3647. </span><span style="mso-fareast-language:JA"
lang="EN-US">There are no normative requirements changes.</span><span
lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">This change also affects the Baseline
Requirements for TSL certificates (BRs) which needs to
point to the new sections of the EVGs. Both documents will
be updated according to the latest version published.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-this-pull-request-pr"><span lang="EN-US">This
ballot is proposed by Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo) and
endorsed by Pedro Fuentes (OISTE) and Ben Wilson
(Mozilla).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-%E2%80%94-motion-begins-%E2%80%94"><span
lang="EN-US">--- Motion Begins ---<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-this-ballot-modifies"><span lang="EN-US">This
ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the
Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS
Certificates" ("TLS Baseline Requirements"), based on
Version 2.0.2 and the “Guidelines for the Issuance and
Management of Extended Validation Certificates” (EVGs)
based on Version 1.8.0. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-modify-the-baseline-"><span lang="EN-US">MODIFY
the TLS EVGs and BRs as specified in the following
Redline:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><a
href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2F90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...dedeebfe036fa5a6f0d7ae985ea08317ba60b8cb&data=05%7C02%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7C864b0df3402c4c71a48308dc3235d77c%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638440454045736811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9dyuwM9JFeGMUk4fRNcFdaLuNlOwQGoDI0XmWGbD%2BQE%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span lang="EN-US">Comparing
90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...dedeebfe036fa5a6f0d7ae985ea08317ba60b8cb
· cabforum/servercert (github.com)</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">--- Motion Ends ---<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-this-ballot-proposes"><span lang="EN-US">This
ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline for the BRs
and EVGs. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as
follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p id="bkmrk-discussion-%2811%2B-days">Discussion (at least 7
days)<o:p></o:p></p>
<ol type="1" start="1">
<li class="null" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Start time:
2024-02-20 1<span lang="SV">7</span>:<span lang="SV">0</span>0:00
UTC<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="null" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3"><span
lang="EN-US">End time: not before 2024-03-04 15:00:00
UTC<o:p></o:p></span></li>
</ol>
<p id="bkmrk-vote-for-approval-%287">Vote for approval (7
days)<o:p></o:p></p>
<ol type="1" start="1">
<li class="null" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo6">Start time:
2024-03-04 15:30:00 UTC<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="null" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo6">End time:
2024-03-11 15:30:00 UTC<o:p></o:p></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Servercert-wg@cabforum.org">Servercert-wg@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>