<style>p {margin:0 0 14px 0}.default-font-1708323490619 {font-size: 14px;font-family: 宋体, arial, Verdana, sans-serif}</style><div class="default-font-1708323490619"><p>
<span style="text-wrap:wrap;font-family:"Microsoft YaHei", 微软雅黑, STHeiti;font-size:16px;">CFCA votes Yes on ballot ballot SC-070.</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="font-family:"Microsoft YaHei", 微软雅黑, STHeiti;font-size:16px;color:#337FE5;">Gao Fei</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="font-family:"Microsoft YaHei", 微软雅黑, STHeiti;font-size:16px;color:#337FE5;">CFCA</span><br>
</p>
<br>
<br>
<span class="spnEditorSign">
<table width="540" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="ke-zeroborder">
<tbody>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="ke-zeroborder">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="color:#999999;padding-top:10px;font-size:12px;">
<br>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</span>
<blockquote name="replyContent" class="ReferenceQuote" style="padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;border-left:#b6b6b6 2px solid;margin-right:0;">
-----原始邮件-----<br>
<b>发件人:</b> <span id="rc_from">"Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg" <servercert-wg@cabforum.org></span><br>
<b>发送时间:</b> <span id="rc_senttime">2024-02-14 00:57:00 (星期三)</span><br>
<b>收件人:</b> "CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List" <servercert-wg@cabforum.org><br>
<b>主题:</b> [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins] SC-070: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
This new voting period is to fix a typo in the End timestamp of the voting period for the previous version of this ballot. The contents of the motion itself are identical. My apologies for the confusion.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
This ballot aims to clarify the existing language around the use of delegated third-parties during domain and IP address control validation. It leaves the existing language in place, and adds specifics for the cases of DNS queries, WHOIS lookups, and contact with the Domain Name Registrat or IP Address Registration Authority.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Additionally, it places these same restrictions on CAA checking, with an effective date of 2024-05-15.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
This ballot is proposed by Aaron Gable (ISRG / Let's Encrypt) and endorsed by Mads Henriksveen (Buypass) and Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA). You can view and comment on the github pull request representing this ballot here: <a href="https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/475" target="_blank">https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/puhttps://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.htmlll/475</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
The preceding discussion can be seen here: <a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.html" target="_blank">https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2024-February/004174.html</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
--- Motion Begins ---
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.2
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following redline: <a href="https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...00ea6e24c474fd0ab6eecc25cb8eb733fffc60c3" target="_blank">https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...00ea6e24c474fd0ab6eecc25cb8eb733fffc60c3</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
--- Motion Ends ---
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Discussion (at least 7 days):
</div>
<div>
- Start: 2024-02-02 22:30 UTC
</div>
<div>
- End: 2024-02-12 22:30 UTC
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Vote for approval (7 days):
</div>
<div>
- Start: 2024-02-13 17:00 UTC
</div>
<div>
- End: 2024-02-20 17:00 UTC
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Thanks,
</div>
<div>
Aaron
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br></div>